The big event of the year on my social calendar happened last weekend (from Friday to Sunday, September 15-17, 2017): Attack-X, Kamloops’s own gaming convention.
I played some Dungeons & Dragons.
Once again, I played The Mutant Epoch by Will McAusland (who lives in Kamloops).
I played some board games. I bought some board games.
Oh, yeah, there was tabletop wargaming, too. (It is the main focus of Attack-X.) The wargamers had a good time, and once again, I got to see some very nice painting and game setups.
I had a great time.
If red is better than blue, starting better than quitting, something better than nothing, water better than wine, failure better than success, area better than volume, fast better than slow, and fast better than rapid, which is better: math or money? Why?
[Clue: The rule has to do with the spelling of the words.]
Submit your answer to Gene Wirchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org>. Your answer should be in the form of a proof. That means to show how your answer must be correct. The deadline is Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at noon Pacific Time. I will post the answer shortly after.
The big event of the year on my social calendar is happening this weekend (from Friday to Sunday, September 15-17, 2017): Attack-X, Kamloops’s own gaming convention.
Attack-X is mainly for tabletop wargaming, but once again, I will be there upholding the boardgaming contingent. There will be other gaming, too (some RPG and historical gaming, at least).
Come see some very interesting games. Tabletop wargaming with all those painted figures and scenery is an aesthetic treat even if you do not play.
Come play some games.
There it is: “taking advantage of X”. It looks so innocent. Maybe, it is, but maybe it is heinous, evil, .
The issue: Context, context, context. Use this handy scoring guide:
“take advantage of a opportunity”: good.
“take advantage of a person”: bad.
“take advantage of a woman”: really bad.
Hey, manager! If you take advantage of Ms. Smith’s availability to work late a couple hours on Wednesday on the Gregg proposal, well and good. If you take advantage of Ms. Smith to get a couple more hours of work done on the Gregg proposal – the same work as in the first example – you are vile and evil. Go figure.
You are taking five courses, one each in Accounting, Biology, Computing Science, English, and Japanese.
The cost of the Japanese textbook is twice that of the English textbook. The cost of the Computing Science textbook is twice that of the Accounting textbook. It is also four-thirds of the cost of the Japanese textbook. The Chemistry textbook cost ten dollars more than the average cost of the other four textbooks.
If each textbook cost an exact number of dollars and you spent somewhere in the $300’s, how much did each textbook cost, and what is the total?
Submit your answer to Gene Wirchenko <email@example.com>. Your answer should be in the form of a proof. That means to show how your answer must be correct. The deadline is Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at noon Pacific Time. I will post the answer shortly after.
Last week, I wrote about bad public transit planning by transit planners. The other side is not perfect either.
Some routes do not have many riders. The route that I take way east out of downtown to work does not have a lot of riders. The route does end at B.C. Wildlife Park so it is useful to have bus service so schoolkids can get there on fieldtrips. The number of passengers on a trip is usually in the single digits though.
Sometimes, it seems that transit service is wanted only so that people can tick a box. A couple years ago, I was on an inventory counting job in Quesnel, BC. The hotel where I was staying was in the outskirts of town. I decided to check out the hobby store downtown. I got a bus schedule and proceeded to arrange my trip. While riding, I noted that the route was not direct but did a lot of twisting and turning through residential neighbourhoods, and that no one was getting on. I asked the driver, and she said that she had been driving the route for about six months, and in that time, she had picked up only two passengers in the neighbourhoods.
If a route does not exist, there will not be passengers, but if there is a route, it still might not get used much. This is rather expensive.
B.C. Transit, in Vancouver, used to publish a newsletter called The Buzzer. I remember reading an article that mentioned some of the costs. Apparently, the system made money on the Broadway bus route (although it would not have if there were not other routes). Some of the other routes were quite expensive to run. The worst cost approximately $12.50 per passenger trip; this was when bus fare was about $1.25 or $1.50.
Public transit seems to be stuck between the two. I wish I saw a solution. Do you have any ideas?
“… leave me with a book.”
The issue: This would normally mean when you leave me, please leave me a book. However, it was said by an acquaintance of mine who works in a used bookstore in Kamloops. He meant for the person have a book when the person left.
Fauxgo is a language that I have just made up. (“faux” is French for false, and “go” is Japanese for language.) Fauxgo has three letters: A, B, and C. Words must be formed using certain rules:
An A can not immediately follow a pair of the same letter (eliminating “CCA”).
An A can not be immediately followed by a B (eliminating “CAB”).
A B must be doubled (eliminating “CBA”).
A C can not immediately follow a pair of the same letter (eliminating “BBC”) or follow two A’s that are at any point previous in the word (eliminating “ACAC”).
Three of the same letter in a row is not permitted (eliminating “AAA”).
Given these rules, what is the longest possible word in Fauxgo?
Submit your answer to Gene Wirchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org>. Your answer should be in the form of a proof. That means to show how your answer must be correct. The deadline is Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at noon Pacific Time. I will post the answer shortly after.